Microsoft Money 2002
Home page



Feeding North Korea
The executive director of the U.N.¡¯s World Food Program on famine and morality

NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE
Aug. 28 — Millions of North Koreans depend on Catherine Bertini for their next meal. As executive director of the United Nations World Food Program, she oversees a humanitarian operation that has sent over $900 million in food aid to North Korea since 1995 and currently feeds about one-third of the country¡¯s people. This year alone, the WFP will distribute more than 800,000 tons of food, working within a system administered by a hardline communist regime that refuses to implement meaningful economic reforms. Critics, among them aid workers who have pulled out of North Korea, argue that economic assistance, even food, props up dictator Kim Jong Il and simply perpetuates suffering. NEWSWEEK¡¯s George Wehrfritz recently spoke to Bertini. Excerpts:

     
     
Advertising on MSNBC  
MSNBC.com
 

  NEWSWEEK: Why should the world keep feeding North Korea?
       Catherine Bertini:
If we don¡¯t send food, children will starve. Period. That¡¯s the argument.
       
       It¡¯s that simple?
       Yes.
       
       Some members of the aid community have come to believe that food aid is enabling Kim Jong Il¡¯s regime and preventing the kind of change that will ultimately be necessary to fix North Korea. Isn¡¯t that a valid argument?
       
And therefore all the food aid should be stopped so that, for heaven knows how long, people would starve to death because we don¡¯t like the government? That¡¯s an immoral position.
       
       
“We never say: ‘We don¡¯t like the government so we won¡¯t send food,?if that food is the difference between life and death.?
CATHERINE BERTINI
executive director, United Nations World Food Program
       Is it always the case that where there is famine the WFP gives aid?
       As long as we can have access to distribution and [understand] the management of the process, we send food. We never say: ¡°We don¡¯t like the government so we won¡¯t send food,¡± if that food is the difference between life and death. We send food to southern Sudan where we have to spend millions of extra dollars dropping it out of airplanes, we send food to Angola, we send food to Afghanistan. We send food everywhere.
       
       You¡¯ve just returned from your fourth trip to North Korea. What¡¯s the situation today?
       
I was there in ¡¯97 [at] the depth of the crisis. The difference, in terms of the health of the children especially, is immense. In 1997, we saw many children in schools who were malnourished. Who had orange hair, extended bellies and were skeletal. Our monitors have been going to the schools since [then], and so they¡¯ve seen that the children are far healthier. But we also saw children in pediatric hospitals who were emaciated, malnourished and had diarrhea. The [situation] is stable but precarious.
       
       How confident are you that WFP food aid is getting to the hungry in North Korea?
       

Newsweek International October 8 Issue
ATLANTIC EDITION: News and features from Europe, Africa and the Middle East
ASIA EDITION: News and features from the Asia Pacific region
LATIN AMERICA EDITION: News and features from Latin America and the Caribbean
COVER STORY: Unmasking Bioterror
WORLD VIEW: The Real World of Foreign Policy
International Letters
International Perspectives
       Monitoring is always challenging. We have the largest contingent—56 international [aid workers] in Pyongyang and five sub-offices. We¡¯re fairly confident for several reasons. One is that most of our aid goes through institutions like schools that we can visit. When you go time after time, you not only see how the children progress, but you also see the routine during feeding. Do [recipients] know what to do when food arrives? Is it orderly or is there a panic? After you¡¯ve been in this business for a while you can tell a lot from that.
       Second, we send foods that are self-targeting, which [in North Korea] are primarily wheat and corn. These are not staples in the North Korean diet, so other people wouldn¡¯t want to eat them unless they were really hungry. Third, a lot of our food for children is processed in the country. The factories operate all day. We go to them regularly to see how they¡¯re doing.
       
       Do you or your colleagues sense that any reform effort is afoot to revive agriculture in North Korea?
       
No. There are small, incremental changes, like an initiative that started a couple of years ago to grow more potatoes. Double cropping has had some success. When we send in a crop assessment mission in early October, I¡¯m asking them to look at whether [fertilizer aid from South Korea] was effective. Agricultural exports say that with improved agricultural practices, with more fertilizer, North Korea still will not grow enough to feed itself. It just doesn¡¯t have the right kind of land and climate. Other countries are in the same situation. But many of those countries have the ability to purchase food somewhere else. North Korea doesn¡¯t, or doesn¡¯t choose to do it.
       
       But they can afford to purchase weapons from Russia and limousines for the elite. That must be frustrating.
       
We have to keep our eye always on our purpose, and our purpose is to end hunger. We don¡¯t have the luxury of deciding whether or not we like the government or its priorities. That¡¯s just not an option for us, and I don¡¯t think it¡¯s an option for any human being in this world.
       
       Is it getting harder to find willing donor states?
       This is our sixth year in North Korea and each year we¡¯ve been virtually fully funded. This year we¡¯ve requested 810,000 tons [of grain], enough to feed one third of the population. It¡¯s the largest request we¡¯ve ever made, and so far we have 91 percent of the volume sourced. What next year will be like, I don¡¯t know.
       
       

Newsweek.MSNBC.com
Click on a section below for more News:
National News
International News
Business & Money
Technology & Health
Lifestyle & Family
Entertainment
Opinion
Live Talk Lineup
       Seven years into the famine and the WFP made its highest aid request ever for North Korea in 2001. Are you concerned about donor fatigue, and is there an exit strategy?
       There¡¯s not right now. If there is a decent harvest this year we won¡¯t have to ask for as much aid. And if there¡¯s good weather and a good harvest and more fertilizer next year, we¡¯ll still have to ask for more. The country will need food aid over the long term. Really, the major thing that will change it is having an economy that allows for importing food.
       
       And the barrier to that is ideological.
       There may be many barriers: political, ideological, commercial. Humanitarians can do this lifesaving work that I believe we are doing, but it is left to the political leadership of North Korea and other countries to make the difference over the long term. That relates to peace and stability and growth.
       
       © 2001 Newsweek, Inc.
       
       
   
MSNBC News Rising Above The Ruins
MSNBC News Exploiting Grief?
MSNBC News One View of the Taliban
MSNBC News The Real World of Foreign Policy
MSNBC News Newsweek International: Atlantic Edition
MSNBC News MSNBC Cover Page
 
     
 
  MSNBC VIEWERS' TOP 10  
 

Would you recommend this story to other viewers?
not at all   1    -   2  -   3  -   4  -   5  -   6  -   7   highly

 
   
 
  Download
  MSNBC is optimized for
Microsoft Internet Explorer
Windows Media Player
 
MSNBC Terms,
  Conditions and Privacy ?2001
   
 
Cover | News | Business | Sports | Local News | Health | Technology | Living & Travel
TV News | Opinions | Weather | Comics
Information Center | Help | News Tools | Write Us | Terms & Conditions & Privacy